Week 13 Results:
Week 13 Results | Season Results | |
---|---|---|
Consensus Picks | 4-2-0 | 17-7-1 (.680) |
Drive Picks | 9-6-0 | 33-23-1 (.579) |
Metric Picks | 10-5-0 | 39-17-1 (.684) |
QBR Picks | 7-8-0 | 28-28-1 (.491) |
As division battles heat up and the playoff picture is becoming clear, there are many important match-ups this week. Here are my model’s picks for this week:
Game | Drive Pick | Metric Pick | QBR Pick |
---|---|---|---|
JAX @ TEN (-4.5) | TEN -4 | JAX +4 | TEN -4 |
IND @ HOU (-4.5) | IND +4.5 | HOU -4.5 | HOU -4.5 |
NYJ @ BUF (-3.5) | NYJ +3.5 | NYJ +3.5 | NYJ +3.5 |
CAR (-1.5) @ CLE | CLE +1.5 | CLE +1.5 | CAR -1.5 |
BAL @ KC (-6.5) | KC -6.5 | BAL +6.5 | KC -6.5 |
NE (-7.5) @ MIA | MIA +7.5 | NE -7.5 | MIA +7.5 |
NO (-8) @ TB | NO -8 | NO -8 | TB +8 |
NYG (-3.5) @ WAS | WAS +3.5 | WAS +3.5 | WAS +3.5 |
ATL @ GB (-5.5) | GB -5.5 | ATL +5.5 | GB -5.5 |
CIN @ LAC (-14) | LAC -14 | LAC -14 | CIN +14 |
DEN (-5.5) @ SF | SF +5.5 | DEN -5.5 | SF +5.5 |
DET (-2.5) @ ARI | DET -2.5 | DET -2.5 | DET -2.5 |
PHI @ DAL (-3.5) | DAL -3.5 | DAL -3.5 | PHI +3.5 |
PIT (10.5) @ OAK | OAK +10.5 | PIT -10.5 | OAK +10.5 |
LAR (-3) @ CHI | CHI +3 | CHI +3 | CHI +3 |
MIN @ SEA (-3) | SEA -3 | SEA -3 | SEA -3 |
Methodology:
Drive Method: Uses average drive statistics such as Points per Drive and TD%
Metric Method: Uses advanced metrics such as SRS and EXP
QBR Method: Uses win statistics and Team QB Ratings
Consensus Picks:
WAS +3.5
NYJ +3.5
DET -2.5
CHI +3
SEA -3
If you would like to to continue seeing these picks every week, please consider donating via PayPal here so I can continue updating the models.
good stuff
LikeLike
Thank you!
LikeLike
If all goes well tonight, I’ll be sending a little tangible thank you your way. Great stuff!
LikeLike
Something I’ve noticed is for any spread between +3.5 and -3.5 that drive and metric agree on has gone 20-2 (90.9%).
LikeLike
That’s interesting, I have noticed that the models do a lot better on games with smaller spreads. Great catch!
LikeLike
Tailed all your consensus picks except WAS. Thank you!
LikeLike
No problem! The models can’t take injuries into account, so staying away from WAS was a good call.
LikeLike